Toleration has not done integration of migrants in the Netherlands any good・・・・・・"We all speak Dutch, know the basic forms of behaviour and the democratic constitutional state."
・・・・・・the PvdA wants to continue to tolerate headscarves in classrooms and mosques with an Arabic architecture. It will become somewhat stricter on wearing of burqas or refusing to shake hands with someone of the opposite sex; immigrants that do that should be told that it is abnormal in the Netherlands. Finally, there is a third category, setting explicit boundaries, under which the PvdA is thinking of female circumcision and violence to save damaged family honour.：・・・・
"The mistake that we should never again make is swallowing criticism of cultures or religions because of tolerance."
" For a long time, it was thought that "it would all eventually turn out well by itself." In practice, that meant looking away from problems. "Feelings of loss and worry were suppressed. And (..) these feelings were not recognised by government and politicians."・・・・・
Among migrants, 80 percent have dual nationality. Ploumen says the "grip of countries of origin" on immigrants "must disappear." She considers that "to become Dutch, you must in principle give up your old nationality." But at the same time "loyalty (to the Netherlands) for me has nothing to do with nationality."
http://www.nisnews.nl/public/241208_1.htm
http://s03.megalodon.jp/2008-1227-1714-32/www.nisnews.nl/public/241208_1.htm
オランダからの記事ですけど、政党の一部から、異文化異教徒に対する我慢の限界のような意見が噴出しているようであります。
多文化主義の最先端をいっていたオランダが統合主義に向かい、伝統を外部から否定するものに対する
tolerationは統合を妨げる、という発想です。
大量な移民という経験のない日本は、どういう方向でいくべきなのでしょうか？
いったん、分離してしまってから、そのゆるんでしまった社会の箍をしめようとするのはかなり無理がある。
はじめからしっかりとした政策をもってのぞむべきことだと思います。
